The person
Experience · work habits · preferred conditions · priorities
The inTalent process
Two perspectives, a clearer conversation: what someone brings, what a role requires, and the conditions in which the work happens.
Proprietary work-profile pilot
Our developing assessment process gives candidates and employers a structured way to describe work habits, preferences, priorities, and actual role conditions. It supports a guided discussion alongside experience, interviews, references, and work evidence.
Current status · Pilot. These instruments have not been validated to predict job performance. They do not produce a universal fit score or automated hiring decision.
Experience · work habits · preferred conditions · priorities
Outcomes · responsibilities · actual conditions · support
A simple path
Confirm outcomes, essential requirements, authority, and the environment actually offered.
Candidate and employer profiles capture their own descriptions. Executive and mid-level routes reflect different depth.
A recruiter-led conversation explores concrete examples and separates preferences from demonstrated ability.
Discuss practical differences, missing information, support, and next questions. People make the decision.
The pilot is developing these views. Automated reports and matching are not being presented as a finished service.
Business outcomes, current working conditions, role requirements, resources, and areas needing clarification.
Self-described habits, workplace preferences, priorities, and questions for a separate evidence conversation.
Where descriptions agree, differ, or need more information. The purpose is a useful discussion, not a percentage ranking.
Keep three questions separate: Can the person demonstrate the work? What environment is being offered? How could they contribute to this team?
Selected employee input may add context in a future supported workflow. A small reference group does not define a whole company’s culture, and similarity to existing employees is not the goal.
No. Pilot answers do not determine Verified status, selection, or rejection. Verification remains a separate review of the evidence and checks agreed for the assignment.
Explore the practical difference, the actual requirement, and possible adjustments. A difference in preferences is not proof that someone cannot perform.
No predictive claim is made. These are unvalidated pilot work profiles. Self-description is not verified capability, and there is no universal match percentage.
Participation and access should be explained before collection. The public website does not collect assessment answers. Pilot participants receive the portal’s notices and participation instructions; employee responses should not be treated as automatically anonymous.
Let’s start with your business
Tell us what you’re building, where the search stands, and what success would look like. We’ll discuss a focused way forward.
Start a conversation